|

State Tax Updates April 2026: OBBBA Conformity, PTET, R&D Credits

What are the most important state tax updates April 2026? Multiple states moved on OBBBA conformity (Oregon, Maine, Kentucky, New Mexico), Maine created a new PTET and 2% high-income surcharge, Wisconsin extended R&D credit carryforwards to 50 years, Kentucky added a 14.25% prediction-market excise, and Washington’s new 9.9% personal income tax on income over $1M faces a constitutional challenge.

If you operate across multiple states, the past two weeks have been heavy. State tax updates April 2026 include OBBBA conformity decisions, new pass-through entity taxes, novel excises on emerging industries, and a fresh round of unclaimed property pressure from Delaware. Deloitte’s State Tax Matters Issue 2026-15 (April 17) summarized the activity, and several items deserve immediate attention from CFOs and multistate tax teams.

At SW Accounting & Consulting Corp, we track state-level conformity and PTET activity for clients with operations across the country. Below are the developments most likely to affect your 2026 estimated payments, your year-end PTET election analysis, and your unclaimed property exposure.

Which states are decoupling from OBBBA in April 2026? 🔀

Oregon, Maine, Kentucky, and others updated their IRC conformity to December 31, 2025 — but selectively decoupled from key OBBBA provisions, especially bonus depreciation, R&D expensing under section 174A, and the section 163(j) interest limitation modifications.

StateOBBBA Items DecoupledEffective
Oregon (S.B. 1507, S.B. 1510)Bonus depreciation (168(k)), small business stock exemption, passenger vehicle loan interest deduction. Adds Oregon EITC increase and new jobs tax credit. Extends PTE-E through 2027.Tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026
Maine (L.D. 2212)Special depreciation for qualified production property (168(n)). Phases in section 174A R&D deduction over 5 years (2026–2030).Tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025
Kentucky (H.B. 757)Section 174A R&D expensing and section 163(j) modifications.Tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026

For multistate filers, the practical impact is significant: federal-state add-back schedules are growing, and the income tax provision for 2026 financial reporting needs to reflect divergent state treatment of OBBBA depreciation and R&D. Don’t assume rolling conformity — verify each state.

⚠ Bonus depreciation watch
Oregon now requires an add-back for the difference between current-year IRC 168(k) deductions and 168(k) as in effect December 1, 2017. If your federal return uses 100% bonus depreciation under OBBBA, your Oregon return will look meaningfully different. Run the deferred state tax calculation now — don’t wait until provision time.

What is the new Maine PTET and 2% surcharge? 💼

Maine created a new pass-through entity tax (PTET) at the highest marginal individual rate, with a 90% refundable credit for qualified members — and added a 2% surcharge on individuals with Maine taxable income over $1 million ($1.5M / $750K depending on filing status).

PTET mechanics in Maine:

  • Annual election at the entity level for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.
  • Tax base: aggregate distributive share of income for all qualified members (residents include all income; nonresidents only Maine-source).
  • Rate: highest marginal Maine individual rate.
  • Member credit: refundable, equal to 90% of the member’s share of PTET paid.
  • Nonresident estimated tax: electing entity also remits 10% estimated tax on nonresident members’ share of PTET paid.

For partners and S-corp shareholders subject to the federal $10K SALT cap, Maine PTET joins 30+ other state workarounds that effectively shift state tax to the entity level — preserving the federal deduction. Run the projection: PTET is not always advantageous for every member.

What’s happening with state R&D credits and prediction markets? 🧪

Wisconsin extended its R&D credit carryforward from 15 to 50 years; Kentucky added a 14.25% excise on prediction market operators and now taxes data brokering services.

Wisconsin’s 50-year carryforward (replacing the prior 15-year limit) is a major shift for tech and life sciences companies that historically generated more R&D credits than they could use. Companies with substantial Wisconsin nexus should re-examine prior-year carryforward expirations and consider amended returns where credits were lost.

Kentucky’s H.B. 775 introduces a novel 14.25% excise tax on prediction market operators — a direct response to the rise of platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. Same legislation: Kentucky removes the 200-transaction sales/use tax nexus threshold (relying solely on the dollar threshold) and starts taxing data brokering services as a taxable transaction. Multistate sales tax compliance teams should add Kentucky to the immediate review list.

💡 Expert Insight
The Wisconsin 50-year R&D carryforward is one of the longest in the country — only a few states are even close. For technology companies considering location for R&D operations, Wisconsin just became materially more attractive vs neighboring Illinois and Minnesota for credit utilization.

What is the Washington 9.9% income tax challenge? ⚖

A complaint filed in Washington challenges the constitutionality of the new 9.9% personal income tax on state taxable income exceeding $1 million — a controversial measure given Washington’s long-standing constitutional debate over income tax authority.

Washington has historically been one of the few US states with no personal income tax. The new 9.9% high-income tax — and the litigation challenging it — will determine whether Washington remains a no-income-tax jurisdiction or shifts permanently. High-net-worth individuals with Washington residency should monitor the case and review estate planning, equity comp timing, and residency planning. The 2026 filing season is the first under this rule; the litigation outcome could trigger refunds.

Why is Delaware sending unclaimed property invitations? 📬

Delaware will mail VDA program invitations on or around April 10, 2026 and August 14, 2026. Companies have 90 days to enroll voluntarily — or face referral to a Department of Finance audit, which typically yields worse outcomes.

Delaware is the country’s most aggressive unclaimed property enforcer due to its second-priority claim on holders incorporated in Delaware (which captures most large US companies). The VDA program lets you self-report and limit the look-back period. The audit alternative often involves contingent-fee third-party auditors with broad discovery authority and can result in millions of dollars of liability for companies that didn’t even realize they had unclaimed property exposure.

If you receive a VDA invitation, the right move is almost always to enroll. Talk to a CPA or specialty unclaimed property advisor immediately.

What action items should multistate tax teams prioritize? ✅

  1. OBBBA decoupling matrix. Build or update a state-by-state matrix tracking conformity to OBBBA bonus depreciation, section 174A R&D, and section 163(j). Use it for your 2026 provision workpapers.
  2. Maine PTET election analysis. Run member-level scenarios. The 90% refundable credit means PTET is generally favorable but not universally so — especially for partial-year members or those with significant non-Maine income.
  3. Wisconsin R&D credit recovery. Pull historical R&D credit schedules. If you lost credits to the prior 15-year carryforward limit, evaluate amended returns under the new 50-year rule.
  4. Delaware unclaimed property check-in. Confirm your governance: who opens the mail, who would route a VDA invitation, what’s the response protocol? Pre-empt the 90-day clock.
  5. Washington high-income clients. Communicate the 9.9% rule, confirm 2026 estimated payments, and monitor the constitutional challenge.

Frequently Asked Questions 🗂

Q: Does state OBBBA decoupling affect my 2025 federal return?
A: No. State decoupling affects only state returns. Your federal return follows OBBBA regardless. The mismatch creates state-only add-backs and adjustments at the state filing level.
Q: Should every Maine pass-through entity make the PTET election?
A: Not automatically. PTET typically benefits members above the federal SALT cap, but the analysis depends on member residency, total federal income, AMT exposure, and other factors. Run a member-level projection before electing.
Q: How does Kentucky’s 14.25% prediction market excise apply?
A: It targets the operators of prediction market platforms, not individual users. Companies operating in this space should consult Kentucky-specific counsel on the effective date, taxable base, and registration requirements.
Q: I received a Delaware VDA invitation — do I have to respond?
A: You have 90 days to enroll in the VDA program. If you don’t, Delaware refers you to the Department of Finance, which typically conducts a more aggressive audit. Enrolling is almost always the better path for companies with even modest exposure.
Q: Will the Washington 9.9% income tax survive the constitutional challenge?
A: Unknown. Washington’s state constitution has historically been interpreted to limit income tax authority. The current case will test that interpretation. High-income Washington residents should plan for both outcomes — paying estimated tax under current law while monitoring the litigation for potential refund opportunities.

For ongoing state tax developments, see Deloitte’s State Tax Matters newsletter (issued bi-weekly) and the relevant state Department of Revenue / Franchise Tax Board pages. The AICPA tracks PTET adoption nationally.

Need help navigating multistate OBBBA conformity, PTET elections, or unclaimed property exposure? SW Accounting & Consulting Corp’s state tax team works with multistate businesses across the country — reach out for a state nexus and conformity review.

Similar Posts